Endless ...
There have been few answers to my question to all member marathon at the parliamentary culture committee on stickers and street art. It feels like you can split the parliamentary women into two camps. Those who responded immediately and those who will not respond at all. Though I can not know, but everyone who responded so far made it within 24 hours. Here are a few examples:
"stickers can probably be a good way to spread message on. Only they do not smear all over. No matter what they contain, you should be very restrektiv of these were placed. Of course it is easy and tempting to put them on lampposts and other places. It is not very beautiful, but experienced enough to littering by many. However, there may be times when it may be "acceptable", such as for creating special attention to particular issues, such as Iraq war. They should however be possible to remove without damaging the surface. However, you can put them in places that are especially meant for this, type "graffiti fence". Some street art debated and possibly when then in the Culture Committee. I have not experienced it yet, but I am new in committee since last fall. Something I found very interesting are paintings that are painted directly onto the sidewalks and the like. Often painted in colors that washed away when it rains as It gives an interesting street art that must constantly "renewed", and allows for ever new impressions. "
Torbjorn Björlund
MP (v)
" They appear well and are often in unexpected places, which attracts attention but also irritationt they may also bring an annoyance. I am less positive when I see them as littering. Did not see them as art. Have not discussed it in the Culture Committee when I was with. "
Hans Rothenberg
MP (m)
" Stickers are a great way to spread the message on. As usual, of course, that does not bring up the property of others, but to put up on lampposts around town, for example, I think is ok. "
Fredrik Malm
MP (Lib)
" Without having a long thought out opinion about what you ask, I feel spontaneous as follows: Sure, stickers just like buttons, stickers and posters to be cultural expression. However, stickers just like graffiti used to destroy or ugly other people's property by an arbitrary act. But the incidence of abuse by such unauthorized uppklistring are supposed to not compromise the fact that the stickers in itself can have a cultural meaning. "
Wallmark
MP (m)
" I like the stickers as a way to spread the message with . If it's good ... may have to do. J But I think it is quite easy and good way to get the spread of its message. However, do not like when stickers are used as obvious degradation or "sabboterar" for someone else. And that's also the answer to the second question. I do not mind that this is used on the town, under the assumption that I wrote above. "
Stefan Wikén
MP (s)
" Thank you for your question about stickers are a great way to spread the message on. It's good for diversity and freedom of cultural life that there will be new artistic expression. While it is important that the person making the stickers respects the laws of the particular vandalism to avoid contributing to the lack of security in residential areas and public places. "
Hans Backman
MP (Lib)
Analysis
can be put simply say that the tone is unusually positive after all. As usual, with some reservations, not to ruin it for others, etc. but comfort all. The sticker is seen as a positive element in the streetscape. Should be interesting to see if anyone else will speak up.
---
Other blogs: stickers , policy
0 comments:
Post a Comment